nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2018, 06, v.25 705-707
微创介入手术对原发性肝癌患者疗效及预后的影响研究
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.13455/j.cnki.cjcor.2018.06.20
摘要:

目的探讨微创介入手术在原发性肝癌患者中的应用效果及预后影响因素。方法选取2014年1月至2017年2月间汉川市人民医院收治的118例行微创介入治疗的原发性肝癌患者,按治疗方法不同分为经肝动脉化疗的A组(TAI组)42例、选择性肝动脉化疗栓塞的B组(TACE组)46例和经皮肝穿刺瘤内注射无水乙醇的C组(TACE+PEI组)30例。分析患者临床相关资料及生存率情况,探究微创介入手术的应用效果及预后影响因素。结果治疗后3年,C组患者生存率(76.7%)高于A组(26.2%)和B组(54.3%),差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。经单因素分析显示,病理分型、肝功能分级和门静脉有无瘤栓下累积均是影响患者预后的主要因素。结论微创介入在原发性肝癌患者中应用效果较优,及时查找影响预后的主要因素,可提高患者生存率。

Abstract:

Objective To study and analyze the application of minimally invasive intervention in patients with primary liver cancer and factors influencing prognosis. Methods From January 2014 to February 2017,118 patients with primary liver cancer undergoing minimally invasive intervention at People's Hospital of Hanchuan were selected. According to different treatment methods,patients were divided into transcatheter arterial infusion( TAI) group( group A,42 patients). There were 46 patients in transarterial chemoembolization( TACE) group( group B,46 patients) and TACE plus percutaneous ethanol injection( PEI) group( group C,30 patients). The clinical data and survival was analyzed. The efficacy of minimally invasive intervention and and factors influencing prognosis were explored. Results At 3 years,the survival rate was significantly higher in group C( 76. 7%) than in group A( 26. 2%) and group B( 54. 3%)( all P < 0. 05). Univariate analysis revealed that pathological type,liver function grade,and with or without accumulation under plugs for portal vein tumor are major factors influencing prognosis. Conclusion The efficacy of minimally invasive intervention in patients with primary liver cancer is superior. Finding out the main factors influencing the prognosis in time is the key to improve the survival rate.

参考文献

[1]张跃伟.微创介入治疗肝癌对机体免疫功能影响的研究现状与展望[J].实用肝脏病杂志,2014,17:231-233.

[2]刘国起,吴向未,杨宏强,等.肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗原发性肝癌的预后因素分析[J].现代肿瘤医学,2016,24:267-270.

[3]康文,向邦德,黄山,等.原发性肝癌患者围手术期乙型肝炎病毒DNA的变化及其影响因素[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2013,19:681-685.

[4]Allemani C,Weir HK,Carreira H,et al.Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009:analysis of individual data for25 676 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in67countries[J].Lancet,2015,385:977-1010.

[5]闻利红,陆宇晗.肝癌微创介入治疗的护理内涵及提升策略[J].中国实用护理杂志,2015,31:2746-2748.

[6]杨君,孙斌,郑加生,等.荟萃分析索拉非尼联合微创介入治疗对原发性肝癌患者临床预后的影响[J].肝脏,2014,19:940-945.

[7]陈景标,王劲,单鸿.小肝癌的手术与微创治疗的现状及研究进展[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2014,22:868-871.

[8]Naya Y,Nakamura T,Qishi M,et al.The efficacy of radio-frequency ablation for metastatic lung or liver tumors of male germ cell tumors as an alternative minimally invasive therapy after salvage chemotherapy[J].Int J Clin Oncol,2015,20:1192-1197.

[9]梁博,王国平.微创介入疗法对肝癌患者T细胞免疫功能的影响分析[J].实用癌症杂志,2015,30:488-489.

[10]钱波,万圣云,喻宗繁,等.原发性肝癌手术预后影响因素分析[J].安徽医科大学学报,2015,50:1479-1482.

[11]陈兵,吴威.射频消融对原发性肝癌治疗评价及预后危险因素分析[J].实用放射学杂志,2016,32:1545-1548.

[12]Mizukoshi E,Yamashita T,Arai K,et al.Enhancement of tumorassociated antigen-specific T cell responses by radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Hepatology,2013,57:1448-1457.

[13]李春华,万华,赵年,等.肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗原发性肝癌的预后相关因素分析[J].医学综述,2014,20:1876-1879.

[14]官敏华,李欣欣.不同微创介入方案对肝癌患者的疗效对比[J].实用癌症杂志,2015,30:603-605.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13455/j.cnki.cjcor.2018.06.20

中图分类号:R735.7

引用信息:

[1]刘礼军,余伟.微创介入手术对原发性肝癌患者疗效及预后的影响研究[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2018,25(06):705-707.DOI:10.13455/j.cnki.cjcor.2018.06.20.

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文