| 53 | 0 | 711 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 探讨放松训练联合根本原因分析对肺癌术后患者疾病认知以及并发症发生率的影响。方法前瞻性选取2021年3月至2023年3月在开封市中心医院接受手术治疗的130例肺癌患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为对照组(65例)和研究组(65例)。对照组中,男41例,女24例;年龄42~78岁[(66.28±4.16)岁]。研究组中,男42例,女23例;年龄40~75岁[(65.73±4.11)岁]。两组患者均接受常规护理,研究组患者在常规护理的基础上开展放松训练联合根本原因分析护理。护理前后采用自行设计的肺癌知识问卷评估疾病认知,采用中文版心理弹性量表(CD-RISC)、世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表(WHOQOL-BREF)分别评估心理状况和生活质量,记录并发症发生情况。两组患者护理前后疾病认知、心理弹性和生活质量评分的比较采用t检验,并发症发生情况的比较采用χ2检验。结果 护理后,研究组患者肺癌认知评分为(13.85±3.71)分,明显高于对照组[(11.24±3.56)分,P<0.001];研究组患者CD-RISC坚韧、自立、乐观维度评分及总分分别为(43.62±5.39)分、(26.83±3.62)分、(11.82±2.18)分和(82.27±10.25)分,均明显高于对照组[分别为(35.87±3.91)分、(20.64±2.47)分、(9.39±1.84)分和(65.90±8.32)分,均P<0.001];研究组患者WHOQOL-BREF的生理、心理、环境和社会维度评分分别为(85.33±8.29)分、(89.59±8.65)分、(94.37±9.35)分和(91.48±8.36)分,均明显高于对照组[分别为(73.56±6.57)分、(76.85±6.95)分、(82.79±8.58)分和(80.96±8.12)分,均P<0.001]。研究组患者并发症的发生率为4.6%(3/65),明显低于对照组[16.9%(11/65);χ2=5.13,P=0.024]。结论 放松训练联合根本原因分析的护理方式可改善肺癌术后患者对疾病的认知,促进其心理状态和生活质量的提升,降低并发症的发生率,促进患者康复。
Abstract:Objective The objective of this study is to investigate relaxation training combined with root cause analysis(RCA) on disease cognition and the incidence of complications in patients after lung cancer surgery. Methods The selected subjects in this study were 130 lung cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital between March 2021 and March 2023. The selected patients were randomly divided into a control group(n=65) and a study group(n=65) using a random number table. The control group included 41 males and 24 females, aged 42-78 years(66.28±4.16), while the study group included 42 males and 23 females, aged 40-75 years(65.73±4.11). Both groups received routine nursing care; in addition, the intervention group received nursing based on relaxation training combined with RCA. Disease cognition was assessed using a selfdeveloped lung cancer knowledge questionnaire. Psychological resilience and quality of life were measured using the Chinese version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale(CDRISC) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Scale(WHOQOL-BREF), respectively. The incidence of complications was recorded. Independent-samples t-tests were used to compare scores between groups before and after the intervention, and the chi-square test was used for comparisons of complication rates. Results After the intervention, the disease cognition score in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group [(13.85±3.71) vs(11.24±3.56), P<0.001]. The intervention group also had significantly higher scores in the CD-RISC dimensions of tenacity, self-reliance, optimism, and total score [(43.62±5.39),(26.83±3.62),(11.82±2.18), and(82.27±10.25), respectively] compared with the control group [(35.87±3.91),(20.64±2.47),(9.39±1.84), and(65.90±8.32); all P < 0.001]. After the intervention, scores in the physiological, psychological, environmental, and social domains of WHOQOL-BREF in the intervention group were also significantly higher [(85.33±8.29),(89.59±8.65),(94.37±9.35),(91.48±8.36)] than those in the control group [(73.56±6.57),(76.85±6.95),(82.79±8.58),(80.96±8.12); all P < 0.001]. The incidence of complications was significantly lower in the intervention group(4.6%, 3/65) than in the control group(16.9%, 11/65; χ2 =5.13, P=0.024). Conclusions Nursing care involving relaxation training combined with root cause analysis can significantly enhance disease cognition, improve psychological well-being and quality of life, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, and facilitate recovery in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery.
[1]Bray F,Laversanne M,Sung H,et al.Global cancer statistics 2022:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2024,74(3):229-263.DOI:10.3322/caac.21834.
[2]毛莹颖,丁君蓉,胡颖燕,等.肺癌患者围手术期症状管理体验和需求的质性研究[J].中华现代护理杂志,2024,30(7):893-899.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20230830-00768.
[3]郭霞.个性心理护理干预模式对肺癌手术患者术前焦虑与术后恢复的效果[J].国际护理学杂志,2020,39(24):4495-4498.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20190220-01366.
[4]谈艳,汤露,张君.心理放松训练干预在肺癌行胸腔镜手术患者中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2022,28(4):160-163.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2022.04.055.
[5]戴小容.基于根本原因分析法为指导护理在胃癌患者护理中应用预防术后并发症效果观察[J].山西医药杂志,2022,51(15):1710-1714.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2022.15.007.
[6]Nguyen KT,Hoang HTX,Bui QV,et al.Effects of music intervention combined with progressive muscle relaxation on anxiety,depression,stress and quality of life among women with cancer receiving chemotherapy:a pilot randomized controlled trial[J].PLo S One,2023,18(11):e0293060.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0293060.
[7]中华医学会肿瘤学分会,中华医学会杂志社.中华医学会肺癌临床诊疗指南(2022版)[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2022,44(6):457-490.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220413-00255.
[8]王丹,何爽,丁倩.聚焦解决模式联合放松训练在老年肺癌患者围术期中的应用效果[J].护理实践与研究,2022,19(21):3251-3255.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2022.21.018.
[9]姚珍,马琳,原姗姗.根因分析联合全方位护理对内镜下结直肠息肉切除患者心理状态、睡眠质量及康复结局的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践,2024,9(25):167-170.DOI:10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413.202425042.
[10]卢樟秀,吴大兴,徐鑫,等.心理弹性量表中文版在医学生中的信效度检验[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2016,24(8):1209-1212.DOI:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2016.08.026.
[11]万崇华.常用生命质量测定量表简介[J].中国行为医学科学,2000,(1):73-75.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2000.01.037.
[12]Siegel RL,Miller KD,Fuchs HE,et al.Cancer statistics,2022[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2022,72(1):7-33.DOI:10.3322/caac.21708.
[13]殷吉善.肺癌患者围手术期肺康复的研究进展[J].中华现代护理杂志,2023,29(16):2237-2240.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20220829-04208.
[14]马景双,王爱平,王艳杰,等.基于前哨症状的肺癌术后化疗患者护理干预方案的构建及应用[J].中华护理杂志,2024,59(2):133-141.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2024.02.001.
[15]田君,沈卓婴,李玲.基于动机行为转化的渐进性康复护理对肺癌化疗患者的影响[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2022,29(4):452-455.DOI:10.13455/j.cnki.cjcor.2022.04.17.
[16]丁红霞,孙红娟,丁海芹,等.放松训练联合自我效能干预对肺癌化疗患者疲乏症状、睡眠质量及自我效能感的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2021,40(1):73-76.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20190729-00022.
[17]陈璐,刘娜,吕琳,等.多模态视角下放松训练对脑胶质瘤患者癌因性疲乏及睡眠障碍的影响[J].中华现代护理杂志,2020,26(31):4394-4400.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20200318-01915.
[18]Wang Y,Yang L,Lin G,et al.The efficacy of progressive muscle relaxation training on cancer-related fatigue and quality of life in patients with cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies[J].Int J Nurs Stud,2024,152:104694.DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104694.
[19]李佳靖,黄帅.基于根本原因分析法的多维模式干预在原发性肝癌患者围手术期的应用效果[J].中国医药导报,2024,21(11):172-175.DOI:10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2024.11.41.
[20]赵嘉琦,杜宇新,康家颖,等.渐进性肌肉放松训练在临床护理实践中的应用现状[J].临床医学进展,2024,14(9):413-420.DOI:10.12677/acm.2024.1492477.
[21]金叶.基于根因分析法的护理干预对精神分裂症患者睡眠质量的影响[J].临床与病理杂志,2020,40(11):2988-2993.DOI:10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2020.11.031.
[22]蔡诗诗,杨奕婷.肺癌患者症状及心理康复研究进展[J].护理学,2024,13(6):691-697.DOI:10.12677/ns.2024.136099.
[23]Bah?ac?U,Atasavun Uysal S,Erdogan?yigün Z,et al.Progressive relaxation training in patients with breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitor therapy-randomized controlled trial[J].PLo S One,2024,19(4):e0301020.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0301020.
[24]王小雨,许欣欣,高明,等.呼吸专项训练辅以放松训练在肺癌患者术后的应用及其对呼吸功能的影响[J].中华实验外科杂志,2022,39(12):2467-2470.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn421213-20220510-01168.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13455/j.cnki.cjcor.113494-20250214-0052
中图分类号:R473.73
引用信息:
[1]刘小翠,于风,陈倩楠.放松训练联合根本原因分析对肺癌术后患者疾病认知和并发症发生率的影响[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2025,32(09):604-610.DOI:10.13455/j.cnki.cjcor.113494-20250214-0052.